Jump to content

Developmental biology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Developmental biologyis the study of the process by whichanimalsandplantsgrow and develop. Developmental biology also encompasses the biology ofregeneration,asexual reproduction,metamorphosis, and the growth and differentiation ofstem cellsin the adult organism.

Perspectives

[edit]

The main processes involved in theembryonic developmentof animals are: tissue patterning (viaregional specificationand patternedcell differentiation);tissue growth; and tissuemorphogenesis.

  • Regional specificationrefers to the processes that create the spatial patterns in a ball or sheet of initially similar cells. This generally involves the action ofcytoplasmic determinants, located within parts of the fertilized egg, and of inductive signals emitted from signaling centers in the embryo. The early stages ofregional specificationdo not generate functional differentiated cells, but cell populations committed to developing to a specific region or part of the organism. These are defined by the expression of specific combinations oftranscription factors.
  • Cell differentiationrelates specifically to the formation of functional cell types such as nerve, muscle, secretory epithelia, etc. Differentiated cells contain large amounts of specific proteins associated with cell function.
  • Morphogenesisrelates to the formation of a three-dimensional shape. It mainly involves the orchestrated movements of cell sheets and of individual cells. Morphogenesis is important for creating the three germ layers of the early embryo (ectoderm,mesoderm, andendoderm) and for building up complex structures during organ development.
  • Tissue growthinvolves both an overall increase in tissue size, and also the differential growth of parts (allometry) which contributes to morphogenesis. Growth mostly occurs throughcell proliferationbut also through changes in cell size or the deposition of extracellular materials.

The development of plants involves similar processes to that of animals. However, plant cells are mostly immotile so morphogenesis is achieved by differential growth, without cell movements. Also, the inductive signals and the genes involved are different from those that control animal development.

Generative biology

[edit]

Generative biologyis thegenerative sciencethat explores the dynamics guiding the development and evolution of a biological morphological form.[1][2][3]

Developmental processes

[edit]

Cell differentiation

[edit]
The Notch-delta system in neurogenesis (Slack Essential Dev Biol Fig 14.12a)

Cell differentiationis the process whereby different functional cell types arise in development. For example, neurons, muscle fibers and hepatocytes (liver cells) are well known types of differentiated cells. Differentiated cells usually produce large amounts of a few proteins that are required for their specific function and this gives them the characteristic appearance that enables them to be recognized under the light microscope. The genes encoding these proteins are highly active. Typically theirchromatinstructure is very open, allowing access for the transcription enzymes, and specific transcription factors bind to regulatory sequences in the DNA in order to activate gene expression.[4][5]For example,NeuroDis a key transcription factor for neuronal differentiation,myogeninfor muscle differentiation, andHNF4for hepatocyte differentiation. Cell differentiation is usually the final stage of development, preceded by several states of commitment which are not visibly differentiated. A single tissue, formed from a single type of progenitor cell or stem cell, often consists of several differentiated cell types. Control of their formation involves a process of lateral inhibition,[6]based on the properties of theNotch signaling pathway.[7]For example, in the neural plate of the embryo this system operates to generate a population of neuronal precursor cells in which NeuroD is highly expressed.

Regeneration

[edit]

Regenerationindicates the ability to regrow a missing part.[8]This is very prevalent amongst plants, which show continuous growth, and also among colonial animals such as hydroids and ascidians. But most interest by developmental biologists has been shown in the regeneration of parts in free living animals. In particular four models have been the subject of much investigation. Two of these have the ability to regenerate whole bodies:Hydra, which can regenerate any part of the polyp from a small fragment,[9]andplanarianworms, which can usually regenerate both heads and tails.[10]Both of these examples have continuous cell turnover fed bystem cellsand, at least in planaria, at least some of the stem cells have been shown to bepluripotent.[11]The other two models show only distal regeneration of appendages. These are the insect appendages, usually the legs of hemimetabolous insects such as the cricket,[12]and the limbs ofurodele amphibians.[13]Considerable information is now available about amphibian limb regeneration and it is known that each cell type regenerates itself, except for connective tissues where there is considerable interconversion between cartilage, dermis and tendons. In terms of the pattern of structures, this is controlled by a re-activation of signals active in the embryo. There is still debate about the old question of whether regeneration is a "pristine" or an "adaptive" property.[14]If the former is the case, with improved knowledge, we might expect to be able to improve regenerative ability in humans. If the latter, then each instance of regeneration is presumed to have arisen by natural selection in circumstances particular to the species, so no general rules would be expected.

Embryonic development of animals

[edit]
Generalized scheme of embryonic development. Slack "Essential Developmental Biology". Fig. 2.8.
The initial stages of human embryogenesis

The sperm and egg fuse in the process of fertilization to form a fertilized egg, orzygote.[15]This undergoes a period of divisions to form a ball or sheet of similar cells called ablastulaorblastoderm. These cell divisions are usually rapid with no growth so the daughter cells are half the size of the mother cell and the whole embryo stays about the same size. They are calledcleavagedivisions.

Mouseepiblastprimordialgerm cells(see Figure: “The initial stages of humanembryogenesis”) undergo extensiveepigeneticreprogramming.[16]This process involvesgenome-wideDNA demethylation,chromatinreorganization andepigeneticimprint erasure leading tototipotency.[16]DNA demethylation is carried out by a process that utilizes the DNAbase excision repairpathway.[17]

Morphogenetic movements convert the cell mass into a three layered structure consisting of multicellular sheets calledectoderm,mesodermandendoderm. These sheets are known asgerm layers. This is the process ofgastrulation. During cleavage and gastrulation the first regional specification events occur. In addition to the formation of the three germ layers themselves, these often generate extraembryonic structures, such as the mammalianplacenta, needed for support and nutrition of the embryo,[18]and also establish differences of commitment along the anteroposterior axis (head, trunk and tail).[19]

Regional specificationis initiated by the presence ofcytoplasmic determinantsin one part of the zygote. The cells that contain the determinant become a signaling center and emit an inducing factor. Because the inducing factor is produced in one place, diffuses away, and decays, it forms a concentration gradient, high near the source cells and low further away.[20][21]The remaining cells of the embryo, which do not contain the determinant, are competent to respond to different concentrations by upregulating specific developmental control genes. This results in a series of zones becoming set up, arranged at progressively greater distance from the signaling center. In each zone a different combination of developmental control genes is upregulated.[22]These genes encodetranscription factorswhich upregulate new combinations of gene activity in each region. Among other functions, these transcription factors control expression of genes conferring specific adhesive and motility properties on the cells in which they are active. Because of these different morphogenetic properties, the cells of each germ layer move to form sheets such that the ectoderm ends up on the outside, mesoderm in the middle, and endoderm on the inside.[23][24]

Schema of the development of the axial twist in vertebrates

Morphogenetic movements not only change the shape and structure of the embryo, but by bringing cell sheets into new spatial relationships they also make possible new phases of signaling and response between them. In addition, first morphogenetic movements of embryogenesis, such as gastrulation,epibolyandtwisting, directly activate pathways involved in endomesoderm specification through mechanotransduction processes.[25][26]This property was suggested to be evolutionary inherited from endomesoderm specification as mechanically stimulated by marine environmental hydrodynamic flow in first animal organisms (first metazoa).[27]Twisting along the body axis by a left-handed chirality is found in allchordates(including vertebrates) and is addressed by theaxial twist theory.[28]

Growthin embryos is mostly autonomous.[29]For each territory of cells the growth rate is controlled by the combination of genes that are active. Free-living embryos do not grow in mass as they have no external food supply. But embryos fed by a placenta or extraembryonic yolk supply can grow very fast, and changes to relative growth rate between parts in these organisms help to produce the final overall anatomy.

The whole process needs to be coordinated in time and how this is controlled is not understood. There may be a master clock able to communicate with all parts of the embryo that controls the course of events, or timing may depend simply on local causal sequences of events.[30]

Metamorphosis

[edit]

Developmental processes are very evident during the process ofmetamorphosis. This occurs in various types of animal. Well-known examples are seen in frogs, which usually hatch as a tadpole and metamorphoses to an adult frog, and certain insects which hatch as a larva and then become remodeled to the adult form during a pupal stage.

All the developmental processes listed above occur during metamorphosis. Examples that have been especially well studied include tail loss and other changes in the tadpole of the frogXenopus,[31][32]and the biology of the imaginal discs, which generate the adult body parts of the flyDrosophila melanogaster.[33][34]

Plant development

[edit]

Plantdevelopmentis the process by which structures originate and mature as a plant grows. It is studied inplant anatomyandplant physiologyas well as plant morphology.

Plants constantly produce new tissues and structures throughout their life frommeristems[35]located at the tips of organs, or between mature tissues. Thus, a living plant always has embryonic tissues. By contrast, an animalembryowill very early produce all of the body parts that it will ever have in its life. When the animal is born (or hatches from its egg), it has all its body parts and from that point will only grow larger and more mature.

The properties of organization seen in a plant areemergent propertieswhich are more than the sum of the individual parts. "The assembly of these tissues and functions into an integrated multicellular organism yields not only the characteristics of the separate parts and processes but also quite a new set of characteristics which would not have been predictable on the basis of examination of the separate parts."[36]

Growth

[edit]

Avascular plantbegins from a single celledzygote, formed byfertilisationof an egg cell by a sperm cell. From that point, it begins to divide to form a plantembryothrough the process ofembryogenesis. As this happens, the resulting cells will organize so that one end becomes the first root, while the other end forms the tip of the shoot. Inseedplants, the embryo will develop one or more "seed leaves" (cotyledons). By the end of embryogenesis, the young plant will have all the parts necessary to begin its life.

Once the embryogerminatesfrom its seed or parent plant, it begins to produce additional organs (leaves, stems, and roots) through the process oforganogenesis. New roots grow from rootmeristemslocated at the tip of the root, and new stems and leaves grow from shootmeristemslocated at the tip of the shoot.[37]Branching occurs when small clumps of cells left behind by the meristem, and which have not yet undergonecellular differentiationto form a specialized tissue, begin to grow as the tip of a new root or shoot. Growth from any such meristem at the tip of a root or shoot is termedprimary growthand results in the lengthening of that root or shoot.Secondary growthresults in widening of a root or shoot from divisions of cells in acambium.[38]

In addition to growth bycelldivision, a plant may grow throughcell elongation.[39]This occurs when individual cells or groups of cells grow longer. Not all plant cells will grow to the same length. When cells on one side of a stem grow longer and faster than cells on the other side, the stem will bend to the side of the slower growing cells as a result. This directional growth can occur via a plant's response to a particular stimulus, such as light (phototropism), gravity (gravitropism), water, (hydrotropism), and physical contact (thigmotropism).

Plant growth and development are mediated by specificplant hormonesand plant growth regulators (PGRs) (Ross et al. 1983).[40]Endogenous hormone levels are influenced by plant age, cold hardiness, dormancy, and other metabolic conditions; photoperiod, drought, temperature, and other external environmental conditions; and exogenous sources of PGRs, e.g., externally applied and of rhizospheric origin.

Morphological variation

[edit]

Plants exhibit natural variation in their form and structure. While all organisms vary from individual to individual, plants exhibit an additional type of variation. Within a single individual, parts are repeated which may differ in form and structure from other similar parts. This variation is most easily seen in the leaves of a plant, though other organs such as stems and flowers may show similar variation. There are three primary causes of this variation: positional effects, environmental effects, and juvenility.

Evolution of plant morphology

[edit]

Transcription factors and transcriptional regulatory networks play key roles in plant morphogenesis and their evolution. During plant landing, many novel transcription factor families emerged and are preferentially wired into the networks of multicellular development, reproduction, and organ development, contributing to more complex morphogenesis of land plants.[41]

Most land plants share a common ancestor, multicellular algae. An example of the evolution of plant morphology is seen in charophytes. Studies have shown that charophytes have traits that are homologous to land plants. There are two main theories of the evolution of plant morphology, these theories are the homologous theory and the antithetic theory. The commonly accepted theory for the evolution of plant morphology is the antithetic theory. The antithetic theory states that the multiple mitotic divisions that take place before meiosis, cause the development of the sporophyte. Then the sporophyte will development as an independent organism.[42]

Developmental model organisms

[edit]

Much of developmental biology research in recent decades has focused on the use of a small number ofmodel organisms. It has turned out that there is much conservation of developmental mechanisms across the animal kingdom. In early development different vertebrate species all use essentially the same inductive signals and the same genes encoding regional identity. Even invertebrates use a similar repertoire of signals and genes although the body parts formed are significantly different. Model organisms each have some particular experimental advantages which have enabled them to become popular among researchers. In one sense they are "models" for the whole animal kingdom, and in another sense they are "models" for human development, which is difficult to study directly for both ethical and practical reasons. Model organisms have been most useful for elucidating the broad nature of developmental mechanisms. The more detail is sought, the more they differ from each other and from humans.

Plants

[edit]

Vertebrates

[edit]
  • Frog:Xenopus[43](X. laevisandX. tropicalis).[44][45]Good embryo supply. Especially suitable for microsurgery.
  • Zebrafish:Danio rerio.[46]Good embryo supply. Well developed genetics.
  • Chicken:Gallus gallus.[47]Early stages similar to mammal, but microsurgery easier. Low cost.
  • Mouse:Mus musculus.[48]A mammal[43]with well developed genetics.

Invertebrates

[edit]

Unicellular

[edit]

Others

[edit]

Also popular for some purposes have beensea urchins[51][43]andascidians.[52]For studies of regenerationurodele amphibianssuch as theaxolotlAmbystoma mexicanumare used,[53]and also planarian worms such asSchmidtea mediterranea.[10]Organoidshave also been demonstrated as an efficient model for development.[54]Plant development has focused on the thale cressArabidopsis thalianaas a model organism.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Webster, Gerry; Goodwin, Brian (13 November 1996)."Chapter 9 - Generative Biology".Form and Transformation: Generative and Relational Principles in Biology. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-35451-6.
  2. ^"Generative Biology: Designing Biologic Medicines with Greater Speed and Success".Amgen. June 7, 2022. Retrieved5 April2024.
  3. ^"Generative Biology: Learning to Program Cellular Machines". NIH. Mar 15, 2024. Retrieved5 April2024.
  4. ^Li B, Carey M, Workman JL (February 2007)."The role of chromatin during transcription".Cell.128(4): 707–19.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.015.PMID17320508.
  5. ^Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, Hawkins RD, et al. (March 2007). "Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome".Nature Genetics.39(3): 311–8.doi:10.1038/ng1966.PMID17277777.S2CID1595885.
  6. ^Meinhardt H, Gierer A (2000)."Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition"(PDF).BioEssays.22(8): 753–760.CiteSeerX10.1.1.477.439.doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200008)22:8<753::aid-bies9>3.0.co;2-z.PMID10918306.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2017-10-27.
  7. ^Sprinzak D, Lakhanpal A, Lebon L, Santat LA, Fontes ME, Anderson GA, et al. (May 2010)."Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states".Nature.465(7294): 86–90.Bibcode:2010Natur.465...86S.doi:10.1038/nature08959.PMC2886601.PMID20418862.
  8. ^Carlson BM (2007).Principles of Regenerative Biology. Burlington MA: Academic Press.
  9. ^Bosch TC (March 2007)."Why polyps regenerate and we don't: towards a cellular and molecular framework for Hydra regeneration".Developmental Biology.303(2): 421–33.doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.012.PMID17234176.
  10. ^abReddien PW, Sánchez Alvarado A (2004). "Fundamentals of planarian regeneration".Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology.20: 725–57.doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.095114.PMID15473858.S2CID1320382.
  11. ^Wagner DE, Wang IE, Reddien PW (May 2011)."Clonogenic neoblasts are pluripotent adult stem cells that underlie planarian regeneration".Science.332(6031): 811–6.Bibcode:2011Sci...332..811W.doi:10.1126/science.1203983.PMC3338249.PMID21566185.
  12. ^Nakamura T, Mito T, Bando T, Ohuchi H, Noji S (January 2008)."Dissecting insect leg regeneration through RNA interference".Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.65(1): 64–72.doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7432-0.PMC11131907.PMID18030418.
  13. ^Simon A, Tanaka EM (2013). "Limb regeneration".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology.2(2): 291–300.doi:10.1002/wdev.73.PMID24009038.S2CID13158705.
  14. ^Slack JM (2013). "Chapter 20".Essential Developmental Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  15. ^Jungnickel MK, Sutton KA, Florman HM (August 2003)."In the beginning: lessons from fertilization in mice and worms".Cell.114(4): 401–4.doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00648-2.PMID12941269.
  16. ^abHackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA, Surani MA (January 2013)."Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine".Science.339(6118): 448–52.Bibcode:2013Sci...339..448H.doi:10.1126/science.1229277.PMC3847602.PMID23223451.
  17. ^Hajkova P, Jeffries SJ, Lee C, Miller N, Jackson SP, Surani MA (July 2010)."Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway".Science.329(5987): 78–82.Bibcode:2010Sci...329...78H.doi:10.1126/science.1187945.PMC3863715.PMID20595612.
  18. ^Steven DH, ed. (1975).Comparative Placentation. London: Academic Press.
  19. ^Kimelman D, Martin BL (2012)."Anterior-posterior patterning in early development: three strategies".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology.1(2): 253–66.doi:10.1002/wdev.25.PMC5560123.PMID23801439.
  20. ^Slack JM (1987). "Morphogenetic gradients - past and present".Trends in Biochemical Sciences.12: 200–204.doi:10.1016/0968-0004(87)90094-6.
  21. ^Rogers KW, Schier AF (2011). "Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation".Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology.27: 377–407.doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154148.PMID21801015.S2CID21477124.
  22. ^Dahmann C, Oates AC, Brand M (January 2011). "Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development".Nature Reviews. Genetics.12(1): 43–55.doi:10.1038/nrg2902.PMID21164524.S2CID1805261.
  23. ^Hardin J, Walston T (August 2004). "Models of morphogenesis: the mechanisms and mechanics of cell rearrangement".Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.14(4): 399–406.doi:10.1016/j.gde.2004.06.008.PMID15261656.
  24. ^Hammerschmidt M, Wedlich D (November 2008)."Regulated adhesion as a driving force of gastrulation movements".Development.135(22): 3625–41.doi:10.1242/dev.015701.PMID18952908.
  25. ^Farge, Emmanuel (2003)."Mechanical induction of twist in the Drosophila foregut/stomodeal primordium".Current Biology.13(16): 1365–1377.doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00576-1.PMID1293230.
  26. ^Brunet, Thibaut; Bouclet, Adrien; et, al (2013)."Evolutionary conservation of early mesoderm specification by mechanotransduction in Bilateria".Nature Communications.4: 2821.Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2821B.doi:10.1038/ncomms3821.PMC3868206.PMID24281726.
  27. ^Nguyen, Ngoc-Minh; Merle, Tatiana; et, al (2022)."Mechano-biochemical marine stimulation of inversion, gastrulation, and endomesoderm specification in multicellular Eukaryota".Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.10: 992371.doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.992371.PMC9754125.PMID36531949.
  28. ^de Lussanet, M.H.E.; Osse, J.W.M. (2012). "An ancestral axial twist explains the contralateral forebain and the optic chiasm in vertebrates".Animal Biology.62(2): 193–216.arXiv:1003.1872.doi:10.1163/157075611X617102.S2CID7399128.
  29. ^O'Farrell PH (2003). "How metazoans reach their full size: the natural history of bigness.". In Hall MN, Raff M, Thomas G (eds.).Cell Growth: Control of Cell Size. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 1–21.
  30. ^Moss EG, Romer-Seibert J (2014). "Cell-intrinsic timing in animal development".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology.3(5): 365–77.doi:10.1002/wdev.145.PMID25124757.S2CID29029979.
  31. ^Tata JR (1996). "Amphibian metamorphosis: an exquisite model for hormonal regulation of postembryonic development in vertebrates".Development, Growth and Differentiation.38(3): 223–231.doi:10.1046/j.1440-169x.1996.t01-2-00001.x.PMID37281700.S2CID84081060.
  32. ^Brown DD, Cai L (June 2007)."Amphibian metamorphosis".Developmental Biology.306(1): 20–33.doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.021.PMC1945045.PMID17449026.
  33. ^Cohen SM (1993). "Imaginal Disc Development.". In Bate M, Martinez-Arias M (eds.).The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Press.
  34. ^Maves L, Schubiger G (October 2003). "Transdetermination in Drosophila imaginal discs: a model for understanding pluripotency and selector gene maintenance".Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.13(5): 472–9.doi:10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.006.PMID14550411.
  35. ^Bäurle I, Laux T (October 2003). "Apical meristems: the plant's fountain of youth". Review.BioEssays.25(10): 961–70.doi:10.1002/bies.10341.PMID14505363.
  36. ^Leopold AC (1964).Plant Growth and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill. p.183.
  37. ^Brand U, Hobe M, Simon R (February 2001). "Functional domains in plant shoot meristems". Review.BioEssays.23(2): 134–41.doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200102)23:2<134::AID-BIES1020>3.0.CO;2-3.PMID11169586.S2CID5833219.
  38. ^Barlow P (May 2005). "Patterned cell determination in a plant tissue: the secondary phloem of trees".BioEssays.27(5): 533–41.doi:10.1002/bies.20214.PMID15832381.
  39. ^Pacifici E, Di Mambro R, Dello Ioio R, Costantino P, Sabatini S (August 2018)."Arabidopsis root".The EMBO Journal.37(16).doi:10.15252/embj.201899134.PMC6092616.PMID30012836.
  40. ^Ross SD, Pharis RP, Binder WD (1983). "Growth regulators and conifers: their physiology and potential uses in forestry.". In Nickell LG (ed.).Plant growth regulating chemicals. Vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 35–78.
  41. ^Jin J, He K, Tang X, Li Z, Lv L, Zhao Y, et al. (July 2015)."An Arabidopsis Transcriptional Regulatory Map Reveals Distinct Functional and Evolutionary Features of Novel Transcription Factors".Molecular Biology and Evolution.32(7): 1767–73.doi:10.1093/molbev/msv058.PMC4476157.PMID25750178.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-06-02.
  42. ^Pires ND, Dolan L (February 2012)."Morphological evolution in land plants: new designs with old genes".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.367(1588): 508–518.doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0252.PMC3248709.PMID22232763.
  43. ^abcdefFriedman, William E. (1999). "Expression of the cell cycle in sperm ofArabidopsis: implications for understanding patterns of gametogenesis and fertilization in plants and other eukaryotes".Development.126(5).The Company of Biologists: 1065–75.doi:10.1242/dev.126.5.1065.ISSN0950-1991.PMID9927606.S2CID13397345.
  44. ^Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1967).Normal table ofXenopus laevis(Daudin). North-Holland, Amsterdam.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  45. ^Harland RM, Grainger RM (December 2011)."Xenopus research: metamorphosed by genetics and genomics".Trends in Genetics.27(12): 507–15.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.08.003.PMC3601910.PMID21963197.
  46. ^Lawson ND, Wolfe SA (July 2011)."Forward and reverse genetic approaches for the analysis of vertebrate development in the zebrafish".Developmental Cell.21(1): 48–64.doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.007.PMID21763608.
  47. ^Rashidi H, Sottile V (April 2009). "The chick embryo: hatching a model for contemporary biomedical research".BioEssays.31(4): 459–65.doi:10.1002/bies.200800168.PMID19274658.S2CID5489431.
  48. ^Behringer R, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Nagy M (2014).Manipulating the Mouse Embryo. A Laboratory Manual(Fourth ed.). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  49. ^St Johnston D (March 2002). "The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster".Nature Reviews. Genetics.3(3): 176–88.doi:10.1038/nrg751.PMID11972155.S2CID195368351.
  50. ^Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR (1997).C.elegans II. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  51. ^Ettensohn CA, Sweet HC (2000)."Patterning the early sea urchin embryo".Current Topics in Developmental Biology Volume 50. Vol. 50. Academic Press. pp.1–44.doi:10.1016/S0070-2153(00)50002-7.ISBN9780121531508.PMID10948448.{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help)
  52. ^Lemaire P (June 2011)."Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: the tunicates".Development.138(11): 2143–52.doi:10.1242/dev.048975.PMID21558365.
  53. ^Nacu E, Tanaka EM (2011). "Limb regeneration: a new development?".Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology.27: 409–40.doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154115.PMID21801016.
  54. ^Ader M, Tanaka EM (December 2014). "Modeling human development in 3D culture".Current Opinion in Cell Biology.31: 23–8.doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2014.06.013.PMID25033469.
  55. ^Weigel D, Glazebrook J (2002).Arabidopsis. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Gilbert SF, Barresi M (2023).Developmental Biology(13th ed.). NY:Oxford University Press.ISBN9780197574591.
  • Slack JM (2013).Essential Developmental Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wolpert L, Tickle C (2011).Principles of Development. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
[edit]
Baidu
map